site map Energy - beyond fossil fuelsLoud music and hearing damageWhat is memory, and intelligence? Incautious claims of IQ genes economics and money zone at abelard.org - government swindles and how to transfer money on the net   technology zone at abelard.org: how to survive and thrive on the web France zone at abelard.org - another France visit abelard's gallery
back to abelard's front page

news & archives

link to document abstracts link to short briefings documents information sources link to news zone        news resources at abelard.org interesting site links at abelard's news and comment zone orientation at abelard's news and comment zone

New translation, the Magna Carta

it's said that the labour party is over -
no, it isn't

article archives at abelard's news and comment zone for other news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button to the left)
deconstruction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
This page helpful?
Like it ! Share it !
to article startThis is the eleventh in a series of documents that analyse manipulative writing techniques used by reporters, and others, in order to promote their own political agendas.

 

it's said that the labour party is over - no, it isn't

"But let's take them at their word. Let's assume that they really do mean what they say, and that a Labour Party led by Burnham, Yvette Cooper or Liz Kendall really would be pro-business, radical on welfare and take an axe to public spending."

The author, though generally correct, makes the grave error of believing anything a socialist says. Tony Bliar was always prepared to say anything for power while remaining a dedicated socialist.

All that the latest candidates are doing is exactly what Bliar did, except maybe Liz Kendall who is either a better liar even than Bliar, or who is in the wrong party.

"Most Labour politicians, for all their current frantic ditching of the party's policies, think the point of power is to push people around in whatever way politicians think best.

"That's in their DNA and it's not going to change. It's why they join the Labour Party. "

Precisely.

"Which is another way of saying the Labour Party's entire future is now in doubt. Because it's just not what people accept now. The era of cap- doffing, take-what-you're-given, do-what-your-elders-and-betters-tell-you died with the rise of consumerism."

Not as long as there remain so many fools that still naively believe what a socialist says,instead of attending to what he or she does.

"That is a damning indictment for any party. But Blair did, of course, win three landslides for Labour. The first and only time that a Labour government has lasted for at least two terms. And he did that by running as an explicitly centrist party – a leader who happened to be in charge of the Labour Party, but who floating voters and Conservatives could support.

"He was only able to do that for two reasons. First, the Conservatives had vacated that centre ground."

Exactly, they moved left under the leadership of John Major! This was the only reason Tony Bliar won 3 elections, or even one! People preferred the real thing to the pretences of the Cambridge  mafia, and their front man, Socialist Johnny.

The result was that real Tory voters stayed away in their millions. That is why Bliar won;not by getting more voters.

"But secondly, the Labour Party let him. That's why Labour's current straits are so dire. Because the contempt in which so many Labour members hold Blair – the man who won them three landslides! – shows how hopeless a task it looks for Labour to make itself electable."

What else can they say in order to keep the loons onside? As said above, they can only get power by lying.

It is a grave error to teach children that they can believe what most people say. It merely trains them to be gullible, a trait often to be seen in the electorate.

"Labour dreamed of emulating the success of France's socialist President Francois Hollande. The Party could do worse than follow the lead of another French politician Nicolas Sarkozy, who, like the Labour Party, is trying to regain power.

"Yesterday, he ditched the name of his Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) for the more voter friendly The Republicans. Perhaps it is time to bury the name of Labour Party along with the 'Ed stone' and replace it with something more voter friendly."

Ah, another name change on the packet. The writer really does not get the core problem, socialists regard lying as a legitimate political weapon.

The end justifies the means.

Meanwhile, the pattern in France follows the pattern that has a long history in the UK. Socialst President François Hollande has an approval rating often below 20%, and soon enough will be gone.

"With the Liberal Democrats a busted flush."

No they're not, they are a natural an honest political movement. They will return, as long as they discipline or eject their leftists.

A hundred years ago, the Liberals split. Part became known as the State Liberals(!) and they eventually drifted to the Labour/Socialist parties.

Bliar has supervised a great state centralisation. He is a socialist to the core. e is just a better liar than most of them.He managed a vast increase of dependence on the State.

That is why the country was damaged to so great an extent, as is every country invaded by the catastrophic Socialist cult.

The name on the packet does no't matter a damn to Socialists. What matters to them is a one party centralised state.

related material
Socialist religions
Herds and the individual - sociology, the ephemeral nature of groups
Fabian Socialists misunderstand Darwinism
Socialism and education - theory and reality
Socialism and warm feelings
For Socialism and Peace: the Labour Party's Programme of Action, 1934
The Communist solar system, 1933


advertising disclaimer

 


email abelard email email_abelard [at] abelard.org

©abelard.org, 1 june 2015


all rights reserved

the address for this document is https://www.abelard.org/news/deconstruction11-labour-party-repackaged.php

x words (including quoted text)
prints as x A4 pages (on my printer and set-up)

navigation bar ( eight equal segments) on 'alleged physics 'teacher' complains about watering down standards , abelards news and comment' page, linking to abstracts, mechanics of inflation,logic has made me hated among men,Abelard of Le Pallet - an introduction,feedback and crowding, orientation, multiple uses for this glittering entity, e-mail abelard short descriptions of documents on www.abelard.org the mechanics of inflation - abelard welcome to outer mongolia - how to get around this ger multiple uses for this glittering entity e-mail abelard at abelard@abelard.org t“Logic has made me hated among men”: Abelard of Le Pallet on theology-abelard Abelard of Le Pallet: Introduction - abelard feedback and crowding - abelard